38 views
Last reviewed: July 31, 2026 | Toronto | Wedding DJ |
Business status: Active.
Last reviewed: July 31, 2026. Business status: Active.
The DJ Floh Back Productions wedding DJ service is presented on its official website as part of a Toronto event-DJ team. The company describes club-calibre DJs who mix across genres and provide music for private events, including dance-focused weddings. Its active official site, 2026 copyright notice and recent wedding-related posts support treating this as a current business identity. Last reviewed: July 31, 2026.
This profile separates documented details from points that still require a direct conversation. The website confirms a team-based DJ format, cross-genre mixing, wedding work and an online quote process. It does not publish a current street address, direct business telephone number, package inclusions or prices, so those details have not been carried over from older listings.
DJ Floh Back Productions focuses on event DJ services, with weddings forming a clearly documented part of its work. The official homepage says its DJs share a standard for mixed sets across genres and identifies dance-party weddings among the events they serve. A company article about current wedding songs includes contributions from several DJs, reinforcing that this is a roster rather than a single-performer listing.
The official site also describes access to event musicians. That page discusses solo performances and duo, trio and quartet combinations, including saxophone, electric violin, guitar, electric bass and vocals. Musicians may perform with a DJ or as a stand-alone booking. Because the page does not present fixed wedding packages, couples should confirm which combinations remain available for their date.
Toronto is the clearest confirmed market: the homepage identifies the company as a Toronto event-DJ team, and its wedding articles repeatedly discuss Toronto bookings and venues. The site also contains examples of work elsewhere in Ontario, but it does not publish a current service-area map, travel radius or travel-fee policy. Availability outside Toronto therefore needs to be checked for the specific venue.
The documented approach may suit couples who want a dance-floor-oriented reception and prefer mixed genres over a fixed single-style set. It may also be relevant when a couple is interested in combining a DJ with live instrumentalists. This is a question of service fit, not a guarantee about a particular DJ, playlist or event outcome.
Company material emphasizes both advance direction and live judgement. Its quote form asks for the event type, date, venue, expected start and end times, guest count and any musical direction already available. A separate planning article advises hosts to discuss their preferred atmosphere, artists and genres while leaving room for the DJ to respond to the guests during the event.
The company’s wedding-song article shows multiple team members discussing pop, rock, disco, hip-hop, EDM, Latin and dancehall selections. That is useful evidence of broad musical discussion within the team, but it is not proof that every assigned DJ has identical specialization. Couples with cultural, multilingual or highly specific genre requirements should ask who would be assigned and request relevant work examples.
The clearest documented strength is the roster model: the official material presents multiple DJs working to a shared cross-genre mixing standard. The detailed enquiry form is another practical feature because it gathers core timing, venue, attendance and music information before a quote. The optional musician roster also gives couples a documented route to explore live performance alongside DJ entertainment.
Evidence gaps remain important. The website does not provide a public package table, equipment list, insurance details, sample contract, cancellation terms, backup policy or defined travel area. It also does not clarify whether DJ service automatically includes MC duties, ceremony audio, microphones, lighting, setup or overtime. These are limitations of the public evidence, not negative findings about the company.
Current prices are not published. The homepage instead invites visitors to complete its booking form to receive rates and notes that the dedicated booking form provides the quickest and most accurate pricing response.
A useful quote should identify the assigned DJ, performance hours, arrival and setup time, sound and microphone requirements, lighting, ceremony or cocktail-hour coverage, musician add-ons, travel, overtime, tax and payment schedule. Couples should compare the complete scope rather than relying on older third-party price ranges.
The confirmed contact route is the booking form on the official website. It asks for the couple’s contact information and key event details, including the date, venue, timing, guest count and musical direction. A separate general-question form is available, but the site specifically directs rate enquiries to the booking form.
No current postal address or direct business telephone number was found on the official pages reviewed. Those fields are therefore left blank rather than repeating unverified legacy data. Couples should use the official domain and retain the submitted enquiry and written response for their records.
Start by confirming availability and the identity of the DJ who would perform. Since the company operates as a team, couples should ask how the match is made, whether they can speak with the proposed DJ before signing and what happens if that person becomes unavailable. They should also establish whether the same person will act as MC or whether announcements require another arrangement.
Technical scope matters just as much as music. Ask who supplies speakers, microphones, a DJ table, dance-floor lighting and separate ceremony sound; when access for setup is required; and whether the venue’s system will be used. If live musicians are being considered, confirm the performers, set length, repertoire, amplification, rehearsal requirements and whether the quote covers coordination with the DJ.
No. Current prices are not published. The official site asks couples to submit its booking form to receive rates based on their event details.
The official website describes solo musicians and duo, trio and quartet combinations that may perform with a DJ or as stand-alone bookings. Couples should confirm current performers, instrumentation and package availability.
The official form requests contact details, event type, date, venue, expected start and end times, guest count and available musical direction. Providing a fuller schedule and equipment requirements should help define the quote.
Toronto is the company’s confirmed public positioning. Its site shows examples of work elsewhere in Ontario, but no current travel radius or fee policy is published, so service outside Toronto must be confirmed directly.
Website: https://flohback.com/





British Columbia » Vancouver (Wedding Photography)





Ontario » Bradford (Farm Weddings)





Alberta » Edmonton (Wedding Photography)





Ontario » Halton Hills (Wedding Banquet Halls)





Ontario » Mississauga (Wedding Photography)





Ontario » Ottawa (Wedding Photography)





Ontario » Newmarket (Wedding Photography)





Ontario » Ottawa (Wedding DJ)
Alberta » Cochrane (Wedding Planning)
British Columbia » Vancouver (Wedding Accessories)
Newfoundland and Labrador » Carbonear (Restaurant Weddings)
Alberta » Edmonton (Wedding Jewellery)
Nova Scotia » Centreville (Wedding Banquet Halls)
Ontario » Carleton Place (Restaurant Weddings)
Quebec » Laval-Ouest (Wedding Invitations)
» Quebec (Castle Wedding)
September 14, 2026
September 11, 2026